Monday, December 9, 2013

New Media to Social Media: The Evolution of Technology Use in the Art World

The use of technology in the art world hails back to the evolution and use of photography in the nineteenth century.  From the technological inquiries of Eadweard Muybridge's zoopraxiscope (early moving image machine, 1879) to Jean Tingueley's self-destructing kinetic sculpture entitled Homage to New York (1960), art has functioned as a reflective response to technological developments.  Postmodernism (1970-present) continued to fuel more interest in performance, photo documentation of conceptually-made art, video, and later experimentation in intermedia art (mix of tradition visual art--painting, sculpture, printmaking, etc.--mixed with television and early computer use).  Nam June Paik's inventive use of programmable television was self-evident as a predecessor for the Internet as an artistic medium,  as noted by his monumental Electronic Highway (video sculpture) as seen below.

Electronic Superhighway (1995-96)by Nam June Paik
Smithsonian Museum of Art
http://thinkvisual.wordpress.com/tag/nam-june-paiks-electronic-superhighway/
On the heels of Paik in the 1980's evolved installation art, which typically converted an indoor gallery space  into a three dimensional space mixing electronic media with traditional forms.  The even later use of the Internet in the work of electronically curious artists, proved to be an active conduit for interactive and real time projects.  International viewer access to the internet and its artistic use has some critics questioning if the internet as an artistic forum is replacing the traditional gallery space as well.


Social media is the latest investigatory forum for the 21st century artist.  Today,  artists use social media interaction as a dialectic and/or a form of documentation, such as the work of Man Battlock's use of Twitter as a form of sculptural documentation of the social media process in his piece called The People's Table.  http://www.thepeoplestable.com/  Clicking on the various Twitter pictures, links the computer user to the that person's Instagram profile.  In addition, online art journals query and critic the new use of social media as an art form, questioning its intellectual potential.  It may well be a half a century's time to determine its trajectory, but it certainly will prove to be a new threshold for cultural art production worldwide http://www.artpapers.org/feature_articles/feature1_2013_0708.htm

Tuesday, December 3, 2013

Lawrence Alloway's "Art and the Communication Network": the Future Basis of Social Art Media

The British art critic, Lawrence Alloway (London 1926-1990), was also an author credited with the coinage of the term "Pop Art."  As the senior curator of art at the Guggenheim Museum of Art in New York (1961-66) he wrote about much art that was concerned with mass media and consumerism.  As someone who was friends with artists, other critics and museum aficionados, he became very well acquainted with the art world, which he later dubbed as a communication network.
 Photograph taken by Alexander Liberman of a gathering at his home
 c.1965 (from left to right: Lawrence Alloway, Tatiana Liberman, Barnett
   Newman, Sylvia Sleigh, Helen Frankenthaler (standing), Robert Motherwell
         and Annalee Newman)

As the social media world sorts itself out as having a kind of systematic order and hierarchy, the paradigm that Alloway puts forth as that which is the art world's foundational structure, may be a suggested format.  As written about in the Tate blog http://www.tate.org.uk/research/publications/tate-papers/art-world-network-and-other-alloway-keywords Alloway saw the art world thusly:


The artwork starts its life in the artist’s studio or ‘work-place’, where it might be seen by a small audience before moving on to the commercial art gallery, a private collection, or a public collection. From either of the three transit hubs it will likely move into a museum exhibition, which will shape its entry into the ‘fourth context’, literature, in the form of exhibition catalogues, art magazine reviews or general interest magazine features. In each case, the diagnosis is not positive for the object, as it is ‘no longer substantially present as an object’ once the progression from studio to literature is enacted. For Alloway, the final stage represented a kind of flattening with the intrusion of literature. Within this progression, Alloway indicated the key players: art historians, curators, collectors, critics and dealers who, by acting out their specific role, incite a role-blurring as the need arose around the promotion of the art or the artist. Not surprisingly, the critic, or writer, has the most altered role at the mid-century because he or she is in the interpretative function of a speeded-up distribution cycle. Of this role, he remarked, ‘The typical strategy of an art critic today is to look for ways to reduce the quantity of art which the network handles so easily’.

If we superimpose today's  social media's template of blogs, micro blogs, and general social networking capabilities, the work of the artist may initially be seen online by a critic such as Alloway, shown in an online exhibition, and written about on a Museum blog or an online periodical by such a critic.  This format, which is already in use, already creates a myriad of opportunities for art exposure, but does not meet Alloway's goals to reduce the quantity of art which the network handles so easily.  Of course, it  is only a selected few artists who may grace the web pages of the MOMA, Guggenheim, Whitney or more recently The New Museum (the major contemporary art venues of Manhattan), yet the possibilities are endless.  In the future which is in its formation stages at present, there will evolve a kind of stratification system that will create a hierarchy of what may become an academic avant garde to a kitsch garde, which will be discriminated by types of readers from the most sophisticated to those who want to merely keep up with links to what is trendy.  If Alloway were alive today, he may have chuckled about how complex  and chaotic a system the web is, but it be certain that his critique of it would be smart and savvy.  We will see what the developmental future holds, and who will form and critique it.